Tuesday, 11 August 2026, KampalaFounded 2016
Marble quarry face and workers on communally held land in Karamoja
negativeLand rights

Karamoja marble and limestone quarrying tests community land agreements in Moroto

Moroto's marble and limestone attract industrial interest on communally held land, where consent processes were designed for individual titles.

By Loyce Nakut··Moroto

Marble and limestone quarrying around Moroto has expanded with regional construction demand, on land held communally by Karamojong groups whose tenure does not fit the consent machinery built for individual titles.

Where the process breaks

Consent is typically obtained from elders or a registered communal land association executive. Members frequently learn of agreements after signature, and compensation reaching individual households is small and inconsistently distributed.

Grazing and access

Quarry boundaries cut across seasonal grazing routes. The disputes reported to district officials are more often about access than about money, and they are rarely addressed in the environmental and social impact assessments.

What has worked elsewhere

In two sub-counties, phased access agreements that keep corridors open during the dry season have reduced conflict substantially. There is no requirement for operators to adopt them and most have not.

The regulatory gap

The Mining and Minerals Act 2022 requires community development agreements but does not prescribe how consent is verified on communally held land. Until that is closed, Karamoja will keep producing the sector's most avoidable disputes.

Sources

How we verified this: licence and production details are checked against official records and ministry statements where they exist. Company-issued figures are reported as claims and attributed. Corrections are welcome at corrections@ugandamineraltrust.com.

Byline
Loyce Nakut

Karamoja Correspondent

Read the full profile and more reporting →
Related coverage

More on Land rights